Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907124›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs scholar2026

Patterns and implications of 2025 NIH-F31 grant terminations for the predoctoral training pipeline.

Jahn Jaramillo, Audrey Harkness

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs scholar, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jahn JaramilloDepartment of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, FL 33136, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7395-6551
Audrey HarknessSchool of Nursing and Health Studies, University of Miami, Miami, FL, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2290-9904

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: In 2025, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) terminated student grants across the Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award Individual Predoctoral Fellowship mechanisms, including both general F31 and F31-Diversity awards, disrupting a critical training pipeline marked by inequities. Since the terminations, the status of many grants has shifted amid an evolving landscape of freezes, appeals, and reinstatements, leading to prolonged uncertainty for predoctoral trainees. Methods: In this article, we analyzed from publicly available data the scope and geographical distribution of terminated F31 (general and diversity) awards from 2025 and considered the implications of these terminations on trainees. We queried publicly available data from Grant Witness (November 16, 2025, to December 18, 2025), a website that monitors grant terminations across various US government agencies, such as NIH. Results: We found that 405 F31 grants were affected by the 2025 terminations; of these, 136 were general F31s, and 269 were F31-Diversity awards. States in the South and Midwest were disproportionately represented among the terminations of diversity-promoting F31s. Conclusion: Federal agencies and academic institutions may consider implementing safeguards, including protections against midyear grant terminations and emergency bridge funding to protect trainees during periods of political and funding instability.

Indexed as

graduategrant terminationHealth Equityminority groupsNational Institutes of Healthpredoctoral trainingresearch support as topicresearch workforce diversitystudents

Identifiers

PMID41907124
PMCPMC13032874

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.