Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41907114›Full record

ArticleBiomaterial investigations in dentistry2026

Effect of salivary pH variations on the adhesive performance of Transbond XT and Orthocem in orthodontic bracket bonding.

Lismory Karina Leiton Narváez, Marjory Elizabeth Vaca Zapata, Mauricio Aguirre Balseca, Karina Maria Salvatore Freitas, Yalil Rodríguez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomaterial investigations in dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lismory Karina Leiton NarváezDepartment of Orthodontics, University of the Hemispheres, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5818-2367
Marjory Elizabeth Vaca ZapataDepartment of Orthodontics, University of the Hemispheres, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-5317-5131
Mauricio Aguirre BalsecaDepartment of Endodontics, University of the Hemispheres, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6597-9844
Karina Maria Salvatore FreitasDepartment of Orthodontics, Ingá University Center Uningá, Maringá, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9145-6334
Yalil RodríguezDepartment of Orthodontics, University of the Hemispheres, Quito, Ecuador.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3107-3013

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This in vitro study aimed to evaluate the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets bonded to acrylic resin specimens with two adhesive systems, Transbond XT and Orthocem, under different salivary pH levels (4, 5, 6, and 7). Materials and methods: A total of 120 acrylic resin specimens (Brava Block Results: Transbond XT consistently showed higher bond strength than Orthocem across all pH levels. Maximum resistance was observed at pH 7 (21.19 ± 5.06 MPa), followed by the control group (19.64 ± 5.28 MPa). Orthocem demonstrated significantly lower values, ranging from 9.51 ± 3.87 MPa (pH 5) to 4.94 ± 2.15 MPa (pH 6). Acidic conditions reduced the bond strength of both adhesives, but Transbond XT maintained clinically reliable values, while Orthocem was more susceptible to performance decline at moderately acidic levels. Conclusions: Salivary pH directly influenced adhesive performance. Transbond XT demonstrated superior resistance under all conditions, whereas Orthocem showed lower but still clinically acceptable shear bond strength values, except at pH 6, where a marked decrease was observed.

Indexed as

adhesive systemsOrthocemOrthodontic bracketssalivary pHshear bond strengthTransbond XT

Identifiers

PMID41907114
PMCPMC13019279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.