ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Saying "Yes" to Saying "No": A Conceptual Framework for Setting Boundaries in Plastic Surgical Practice.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Looksmaxxing and the Digital Evolution of Male Beauty Standards: Ethical Implications in Plastic Surgery.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In most clinical specialties, including plastic surgery, saying "no" to unnecessary, ill-timed, or simply frivolous referrals is discouraged and never taught. Carried forward into practice, this inability leads to overwhelming workloads, chaotic schedules, loss of professional autonomy, and exhaustion-well-known triggers for burnout. Providing communication tools to politely frame a refusal without jeopardizing professional relationships is essential. Methods: This narrative review provided a broad overview of existing literature on the topic across medical and nonmedical customer-service sectors, combined with the authors' own experience. It established a context for a comprehensive summary and used the available material to create vignette-based training modules for residents and junior attendings. Results: Specifically, the traditional teaching is to always say yes to all clinical consults, no matter what they are or how overworked one already is. In contrast, publications on physician-burnout strongly recommend setting boundaries, none of which teach physicians how to do so. Although communication skills are taught during training, specific skills for politely refusing referrals, especially if inappropriate or ill-timed, are lacking. Conclusions: Using the reviewed material and our experience, a rich source of teaching materials, including clinical vignettes, was created that can be used by program leaders and younger faculty to say "no," while maintaining honesty, professionalism, and positive referral relationships. Removing the stigma of self-guilt associated with saying "no" when appropriate, and doing so via clear and respectful communication, builds credibility, maintains professional autonomy, demonstrates integrity, and also ensures that patients receive the best possible care.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.