ArticleActa Cardiologica Sinica2026
Multidisciplinary Approaches for Diagnosing Underrecognized Transthyretin Amyloidosis in Real-World Practice.
Article in Acta Cardiologica Sinica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Rethinking Transthyretin Amyloidosis: Insights from Taiwan Illuminate a Global Challenge.Acta Cardiologica Sinica · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Transthyretin amyloidosis (ATTR) is a rare but progressive disease. Its heterogeneous clinical presentation often leads to a delayed diagnosis. This study aimed to review the clinical manifestations of ATTR at diagnosis across cardiology and neurology subspecialties and to identify common red-flag symptoms in real-world practice. Methods: We analyzed consecutive patients diagnosed with ATTR between March 2018 and December 2024. Variant ATTR (ATTR-v) was confirmed by genetic testing, while wild-type ATTR (ATTR-wt) was diagnosed based on the absence of monoclonal protein, a positive Results: Among the 63 enrolled ATTR patients (median age 64 years, 66.7% men), 27% were diagnosed in cardiology clinics and 73% in neurology clinics. Six had ATTR-wt (all diagnosed by cardiologists), while 57 had ATTR-v (94.7% with the Ala97Ser mutation), predominantly diagnosed by neurologists. Some patients presenting to cardiology clinics had considerable neurological symptoms or a history of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome in addition to prominent cardiac involvement. Conversely, patients presenting to neurology clinics had significant cardiac involvement comparable to those diagnosed in cardiology clinics. Peripheral neuropathy was the most prevalent red flag, followed by autonomic dysfunction, discordant QRS voltages on ECG, and a history of bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Notably, the absence of low-voltage QRS or the presence of left ventricular hypertrophy on ECG did not necessarily exclude ATTR. Conclusions: Recognizing red-flag symptoms remains the key to identifying ATTR. Early detection of ATTR requires clinical vigilance and multidisciplinary collaboration across subspecialties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.