ArticleFrontiers in psychology2025
Psychometric properties of the EDINA questionnaire for assessing self-esteem in childhood in a Peruvian population.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research aimed to establish and validate the psychometric properties of the EDINA Questionnaire in a Peruvian sample, given the impact of healthy self-esteem on emotional development. A sample of 630 children, aged between 4 and 7 years, selected from educational institutions in the Puno region, participated. Content validity was confirmed using Aiken's V (V ≥ 0.80), assessed by a panel of 10 experts who evaluated criteria such as clarity, congruence, and cultural appropriateness. Three items were adjusted after analyzing the results of the 95% confidence interval. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) resulted in a unidimensional factor solution in which all items presented loadings between 0.6 and 0.8; this procedure indicated a Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin value of KMO = 0.978 and a significant Bartlett's test of sphericity (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.