ArticleUltrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology2026
Brain injury in twin anemia-polycythemia sequence: prevalence, severity and long-term neurodevelopmental outcome.
Article in Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe primary objective of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, type and severity of pre- and postnatal brain injury in monochorionic twins with twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS). Secondary objectives were to conduct within-pair comparisons between donor and recipient twins of structural cranial ultrasound (cUS) measurements and to evaluate the association between brain injury and neurodevelopmental outcome in TAPS.
methodsThis was a single-center retrospective cohort study including cases of spontaneous and postlaser TAPS delivered at the Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands, between May 2002 and December 2024. We evaluated all available pre- and postnatal neuroimaging, including ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging, to identify brain injury. Structural measurements were obtained from cUS performed within 3 days after birth, and were included only if high-quality images were available for both cotwins. Neurodevelopmental outcome was evaluated using standardized age-appropriate assessments for cognitive and motor development.
resultsA total of 256 infants were included from 132 pregnancies (124 twin pairs and eight single survivors). Brain injury was observed in 16.8% (43/256) of infants, of which 93.0% (40/43) had a postnatal origin. There was no significant difference in the prevalence of brain injury between cases of spontaneous TAPS (13.5% (20/148)) and postlaser TAPS (21.3% (23/108)) (P = 0.1). Severe brain injury was observed in 7.4% (19/256) of the infants, with no significant difference between donor twins (6.5% (8/124)) and recipient twins (8.3% (11/132)) (P = 0.54). Lower gestational age at birth was an independent risk factor for brain injury (odds ratio, 1.31 (95% CI, 1.15-1.50); P < 0.01). Among infants with moderate-to-severe neurodevelopmental impairment (NDI), 57.1% (8/14) had evidence of brain injury. Brain injury alone did not account for the impairment in 71.4% (10/14) of cases with moderate-to-severe NDI.
conclusionsBrain injury was observed in approximately one-fifth of infants with TAPS, was primarily postnatal in origin and was strongly associated with preterm birth. In the majority of infants with moderate-to-severe NDI, the impairment could not be explained by the observed severe brain injury alone, emphasizing its probable multifactorial origin. © 2026 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.