ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2026
The effect of WALANT on outcomes of flexor tenolysis.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the outcomes of the flexor tenolysis cases with wide-awake local anesthesia no tourniquet (WALANT) and to compare them with cases with other anesthesia types. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween March 2004 and March 2024, a total of 104 patients with 150 fingers with flexor tenolysis (71 males, 33 females; mean age: 32.67 ± 11.64 years; range, 16 to 62 years) were included in the study. The WALANT group consisted of 41 patients with 53 fingers, while the conventional anesthesia group consisted of 63 patients with 97 fingers. Pre- and postoperative total active motion (TAM) gains were compared between the two groups and relevant factors were investigated.
resultsOverall TAM gain was 47% in our study cohort. The TAM gain was 55% and 43% in the WALANT group and in the conventional anesthesia group, indicating a statistically significant difference (p = 0.005). The best TAM gains were observed in the clean-cut injury type. The TAM gains were better in the cases without fractures. Age was a significant factor in the tenolysis outcomes, and younger patients had improved outcomes.
conclusionOur study results indicate a significant difference in the TAM gain between the WALANT and conventional methods. Taken together, we believe that the application of WALANT in tenolysis of flexor tendon adhesions represents a significant advancement in hand surgery. The ability to perform the procedure under local anesthesia while allowing for immediate assessment of tendon function enhances the surgical precision and results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.