ArticleJoint diseases and related surgery2026
Irreducible metacarpophalangeal joint dislocations: Clinical characteristics, surgical approaches, and outcomes.
Article in Joint diseases and related surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Arthroscopic Reduction Techniques for Complex Metacarpophalangeal Joint Dislocation With Sesamoid Bone Entrapment: A Case Series.Journal of hand surgery global online · 2027Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study aims to evaluate the clinical characteristics, surgical management, and outcomes of irreducible metacarpophalangeal (MCP) dislocations. PATIENTS AND
methodsBetween August 2020 and August 2024, a total of 13 patients (7 males, 6 females; mean age: 29.2 ± 23.7 years; range, 7 to 78 years) with MCP dislocations who were surgically treated were retrospectively analyzed. Demographics, dislocation patterns, obstructing elements, operative approach, and postoperative complications were documented. Functional outcomes included MCP range of motion (ROM), extension lag, grip strength recovery compared to the contralateral hand, and patient-reported disability using the Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire (QuickDASH) questionnaire.
resultsThe index finger was most frequently involved (53.8%), with dorsal dislocations predominating (76.9%). A dorsal approach was performed in 76.9%. Dorsal reconstruction resulted in greater MCP ROM (flexion 85.8° ± 7.5° vs. 78.4° ± 6.7°), smaller extension lag (-1.8° ± 3.7° vs. -4.2° ± 5.3°), and lower disability scores (QuickDASH 4.0 ± 4.7 vs. 8.8 ± 5.5). Volar reconstruction provided superior grip strength (107.5 ± 8.7% vs. 90.9 ± 12.3%), exceeding baseline. Return-to-sport was earlier after the dorsal approach (11.5 ± 2.9 vs. 14.4 ± 3.0 weeks). Although differences did not reach statistical significance, large effect sizes (d ≥ 0.8) highlighted clinical relevance. Transient postoperative hypoesthesia occurred in two volar cases.
conclusionTimely operative management, tailored to dislocation type and obstructing anatomy, is essential. The dorsal approach optimizes MCP mobility, disability reduction, and athletic recovery, whereas the volar approach enhances grip strength. These complementary outcomes underscore the importance of individualized surgical selection and structured rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.