ArticleAnnals of botany2026
Revisiting the enigmatic Cheirolepidiaceae: origins, phylogenetic relationships, and a new whole-plant concept.
Article in Annals of botany, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Seed-cone architecture of Pararaucaria utahensis Gee, Howell et Dayvault sp. nov. (Cheirolepidiaceae) from the Upper Jurassic Morrison Formation of Utah, USA.American journal of botany · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
aimsThe extinct conifer family Cheirolepidiaceae spanned from the Late Triassic to early Palaeocene and was distributed worldwide. While it is known from multiple organs, there are no Cheirolepidiaceae whole-plant reconstructions to date. The relationships of Cheirolepidiaceae with different plant groups have been extensively discussed in the literature, but their phylogenetic position has not been thoroughly explored. To fill these gaps, we studied seed cones associated with other Cheirolepidiaceae organ remains from the Early Cretaceous of Arkansas and investigated their phylogenetic position.
methodsWe studied previously collected fossil remains from the Holly Creek Formation and included them in total evidence phylogenetic analyses with other Cheirolepidiaceae species and representatives of all major living and extinct conifer groups. We performed a time-calibrated Bayesian analysis under the fossilized birth-death model and 60 maximum parsimony analyses with varying search conditions. KEY
resultsWe describe Arkansia axsmithii sp. nov. based on seed cones and isolated ovuliferous complexes associated with previously described wood, leafy shoots, pollen cones and pollen. We separated the associated vegetative material into Pseudofrenelopsis axsmithii sp. nov. Our phylogenetic analyses most frequently show the Cheirolepidiaceae as sister to the crown group of conifers, and more rarely as sister to Araucariales, Cupressales + Araucariales, or Araucaria. In some cases, Pararaucaria is recovered outside of Cheirolepidiaceae. We estimated ages of Carboniferous for the divergence of conifers and Cordaitales, and Late Triassic for the initial diversifications of Cheirolepidiaceae and the conifer crown group.
conclusionsThe Arkansia plant constitutes the most completely known Cheirolepidiaceae plant to date. Our phylogenetic analyses support Cheirolepidiaceae as a transitional lineage between voltzialean and living conifers, reflected in their ovuliferous complex morphology, which shows intermediate traits between voltziacean voltzialeans and extant taxa. Age estimates of deep nodes of conifer phylogeny are broadly congruent with the fossil record, suggesting a long-lasting stem group and an origin of crown-group conifers in the Late Triassic.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.