ArticleJournal of gynecologic oncology2026
Enhanced ovarian cancer diagnosis using deep learning on pelvic ultrasound with integrated clinical data: retrospective multicenter study.
Article in Journal of gynecologic oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThis study aimed to develop a deep learning (DL) model to enhance the differential diagnosis of benign and malignant ovarian tumors by integrating pelvic ultrasound images with clinical data, such as age and cancer antigen (CA)-125 levels.
methodsWe analyzed pelvic ultrasound images, age, and CA-125 levels from 804 patients diagnosed with ovarian tumors (446 benign, 358 malignant) from 2015 to 2022. Images were segmented into cystic and solid components for feature extraction. Patients were divided into training (n=565), validation (n=76), and test datasets (n=163). ResNet50 and DenseNet121 models were trained on these data, with clinical information added to classifier architecture for improved prediction accuracy.
resultsUsing ultrasound images alone, ResNet50 and DenseNet121 achieved areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUCs) of 0.84 and 0.82, respectively. When clinical data and segmented solid images were included, AUCs improved to 0.95 for ResNet50 and 0.96 for DenseNet121. For the test set, ResNet50 and DenseNet121 achieved sensitivities of 90% and 81%, specificities of 93% and 97%, positive predictive values of 92% and 95%, and negative predictive values of 92% and 86%.
conclusionBinary classification model based on DL algorithms using ultrasound images can distinguish between benign and malignant ovarian tumors accurately. Segmentation of solid portion and clinical information of age and CA-125 at diagnosis combined with the pelvic ultrasound images increased the accuracy of the classification model.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.