Trial reportInternational journal of cosmetic science2026
A serum and cream moisturization regimen outperforms separate use in sustaining hydration, reducing TEWL, and balancing surface lipids over an 8-h study.
Trial report in International journal of cosmetic science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin hydration can be achieved through complementary mechanisms in skincare formulations. Humectants retain water, while emollients and occlusives reduce transepidermal water loss (TEWL) by reinforcing the epidermal barrier. Although consumers follow skincare routines, biophysical comparisons of single-product use versus regimen use across parameters such as hydration, TEWL, and sebum content are limited. Our study measured these parameters in 123 volunteers randomized into four treatment groups: Facial Cleanser (FC) control, Hyaluronic Acid Serum (HAS) group, Moisturizing Cream (MC) group, and Routine comprising HAS followed by MC. Corneometry, TEWL, and sebumetry were measured at baseline, 30 min, and 8 h after treatment application. Corneometry results at 30 min showed that HAS, MC, and Routine increased hydration when compared with FC. At 8 h, only the Routine remained higher than FC. Additionally, TEWL decreased at 30 min for HAS, MC, and the Routine versus FC, whereas at 8 h, only HAS remained lower than FC. We measured sebumetry because skin surface lipids support the epidermal barrier and thus maintain water homeostasis. FC reduced sebum at 30 min due to sebum stripping. However, at 8 h, the Routine's sebum measurements stayed closest to baseline and were lower than HAS and MC individually. Apart from objective measurements, perceived hydration was assessed by a subjective questionnaire. Volunteers who applied the routine reported greater immediate and long-lasting hydration than those who applied HAS or MC individually. These results suggest that layering the Routine improved hydration durability with barrier-relevant water-retention benefits over an 8-h wear period.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.