Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906660›Full record

ArticleChemistryOpen2026

Using MD Simulations to Understand the Impact of Directed Evolution on Oxygen Affinity in Amine Oxidases.

Christopher R Field, Rowan Lindeque, Jonathan P Dolan, Julie Østerby Madsen, Sam Hay, Nicholas J Turner, John M Woodley, Sebastian C Cosgrove

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in ChemistryOpen, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Christopher R FieldFuture Biomanufacturing Research Hub, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, School of Natural Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7777-5782
Rowan LindequeDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-9290-9577
Jonathan P DolanSchool of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7009-2225
Julie Østerby MadsenDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-3463-0583
Sam HayManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, School of Natural Sciences, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3274-0938
Nicholas J TurnerManchester Institute of Biotechnology, Department of Chemistry, University of Manchester, School of Natural Sciences, Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8708-0781
John M WoodleyDepartment of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-1594-507X
Sebastian C CosgroveSchool of Chemical and Physical Sciences, Keele University, Keele, Staffordshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9541-7201

Funding

Engineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilRoyal Society of Chemistry E20-9653
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mutants of the amine oxidase from Aspergillus niger were tested to ascertain the need for molecular oxygen across the family of mutant enzymes. Two of the variants were selected, namely D5 and D11, which had 5 and 10 mutations, respectively, versus the wild type. Experimental observations showed a difference in oxygen requirements between variants. Molecular dynamics simulations were then used to give a potential explanation for this difference in observed activity at a molecular level.

Indexed as

Amine Oxidase (Copper-Containing)Aspergillus nigerDirected Molecular EvolutionMolecular Dynamics SimulationOxygenMutationAmine Oxidase (Copper-Containing)Oxygen

Identifiers

PMID41906660
PMCPMC13140974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.