ArticleHealth policy and planning2026
Macroeconomic fluctuations and the prioritization of healthcare funding by local governments: longitudinal evidence from 5461 Brazilian municipalities.
Article in Health policy and planning, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Securing sufficient healthcare funding remains a critical challenge for many low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), especially during periods of economic instability. While economic growth often boosts health system finances in LMICs, little is known about how local governments adjust healthcare spending in response to macroeconomic fluctuations, particularly during recessions. This study analyses a longitudinal dataset of 5461 Brazilian municipalities between 2004 and 2017, using fixed-effect panel regressions to examine the relationship between municipal Gross Domestic Product (GDP) changes and healthcare spending. There is a positive elasticity between the economic conditions, measured by GDP, and municipal financial expenditures, particularly health and social expenditures. A 1% increase in municipal GDP per capita was associated with a 0.06% [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.04-0.09] increase in total municipal expenditures and a 0.12% (95% CI 0.06-0.18) increase in health and sanitation expenditures. However, during recessions, municipal governments reduced health expenditures, particularly for capital investments. Municipalities with lower income per capita and lower private insurance coverage were more vulnerable to these cuts in economic downturns. We find suggestive evidence that the cuts in poorer municipalities and in municipalities relying disproportionately on federal transfers were more pronounced for social and health expenditures, although the difference between municipalities is small. These findings highlight the sensitivity of local finances to economic fluctuations, underscoring the need for policies that protect healthcare funding during economic downturns.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.