Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906636›Full record

ArticleAustralian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc2026

Development and Validation of an Instrument to Assess Endodontists' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices Regarding Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

Lisa Morais Fernandes Oliveira, Francielle Silvestre Verner, Pedro Henrique Berbert de Carvalho, Rafael Binato Junqueira

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Australian endodontic journal : the journal of the Australian Society of Endodontology Inc, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lisa Morais Fernandes OliveiraPostgraduate Program in Applied Health Sciences (PPGCAS), Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Francielle Silvestre VernerDivision of Oral Radiology, Department of Dentistry, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Pedro Henrique Berbert de CarvalhoNICTA, Body Image and Eating Disorders Research Group, Federal University of Juiz de Fora, Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
Rafael Binato JunqueiraDepartment of Dentistry, Division of Endodontics, Federal University of Juiz de Fora (UFJF), Governador Valadares, Minas Gerais, Brazil.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0732-2753

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There is a scarcity of data regarding knowledge, attitudes and practices (KAP) of endodontists about cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which may be related to the lack of valid and reliable measures. The present study aimed to develop and validate a KAP measure about CBCT. The developed measure showed good content validity and was administered to 506 endodontists. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis revealed a factorial structure composed of three factors (KAP) with 13 items. The measure showed evidence of good internal consistency and discriminant validity, being able to accurately discriminate KAP according to the length of experience and level of education. Taken together, results provided evidence of good psychometric properties of a new KAP measure regarding CBCT, allowing future research in the field.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelCone-Beam Computed TomographyEndodontistsHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesattitudescone‐beam computed tomographyknowledgepracticespsychometry

Identifiers

PMID41906636
PMCPMC13436305

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.