ArticleMedeniyet medical journal2026
Evaluating the Educational Quality of Benign Prostate Surgery Videos on YouTube: A Human and AI-Based Comparative Analysis.
Article in Medeniyet medical journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: YouTube has become an increasingly popular platform for surgical education, yet the quality and reliability of its medical content remain uncertain. With the rise of artificial intelligence (AI), models such as ChatGPT offer new possibilities for automated educational content evaluation. This study aimed to compare human and AI-based assessments of the educational quality and reliability of YouTube videos on benign prostate surgery. Methods: A total of 100 videos of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate, transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP), transvesical prostatectomy, and thulium fiber laser enucleation of the prostate were analyzed. Two urology specialists and ChatGPT-5 (in two independent runs) evaluated each video using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and the modified DISCERN tool. Popularity metrics (views, likes, subscribers, duration) were also recorded. Non-parametric statistical tests and Spearman correlation analyses were applied. Results: Human raters assigned significantly higher DISCERN and GQS scores than both AI runs (p<0.01). TURP videos consistently received lower scores across all evaluators. No significant quality differences were found among video sources. Both AI runs showed strong internal consistency (ρ=0.62-0.75) and reproduced human rating patterns, though with lower mean values. Engagement metrics showed weak or no correlation with quality. Conclusions: AI models can provide consistent, scalable quality assessments but still underestimate educational value compared with human experts. Hybrid AI-expert evaluation may enhance the reliability of the appraisal of online surgical videos.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.