ArticleJACC. Advances2026
Feasibility of Self-Reported Surveillance After Catheter Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation Using A Mobile Application.
Article in JACC. Advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05504356 (Volunteers to Investigate Best Results for Ablation and Novel Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Volunteers to Investigate Best Results for Ablation and Novel Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
30 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe effectiveness of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) can only be fully assessed months after the procedure, and many complications do not present until after hospital discharge. Readily available means to monitor patients for quality assurance are hampered by the impracticality of following patients after they leave referral centers.
objectivesThe objective of the study was to determine if a mobile app-based platform that interfaced directly with AF ablation patients using their smartphones might be feasible.
methodsIn the VIBRANT-AF (Volunteers to Investigate Best Results for Ablation and Novel Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation) study, AF catheter ablation patients were monitored with baseline and weekly SMS messages accompanied by mobile application-based questionnaires using the Eureka digital research platform.
resultsAmong 493 participants enrolled from 17 sites, 4% reported an emergency department visit related to AF or the catheter ablation procedure. Among 236 followed for 1 year, participants completed a median of 25 (IQR: 7-42) electronic visits. A 2-fold increase in response rate was observed among those who completed at least 1 of the first 2 weeks of surveys. Recurrent AF at 1 year was reported in 30% of participants. The validated Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality of Life score improved from baseline to 6 months, with sustained improvement at 12 months. Validation of self-reported AF and complications in a subset of the cohort demonstrated substantial agreement with KardiaMobile electrocardiograms and electronic health record data, respectively.
conclusionsDirect patient-facing, mobile application-based surveillance is feasible following catheter AF ablation, with self-reported rates of effectiveness and complications similar to previous reports using conventional means. (Volunteers to Investigate Best Results for Ablation and Novel Therapies for Atrial Fibrillation [VIBRANT-AF]; NCT05504356).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.