Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906433›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of social psychology2026

Perceptions of anomie in society shape support for wealth redistribution.

Kelly Kirkland, Christoph Klebl, Christian T Elbæk, Jolanda Jetten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of social psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kelly KirklandUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7286-6506
Christoph KleblUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0238-8021
Christian T ElbækAarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7039-4565
Jolanda JettenUniversity of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7588-5355

Funding

Aarhus University Research Foundation (AUFF) AUFF-E-2023-9-64Australian Laureate Fellowships FL180100094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding the factors that influence support for wealth redistribution is essential to address growing economic divides around the world. We propose that perceptions of anomie-the belief that society's social and political fabric is crumbling-can influence support for redistribution in opposing ways. When people see society as deteriorating, they may seek drastic change, increasing support for redistribution. Conversely, viewing society as descending into anomie may also foster a belief that the government will mismanage redistributed wealth, thereby reducing support. Study 1 examined these relationships in a U.S. sample, confirming the presence of these two opposing pathways, and Study 2 then replicated the findings in the UK. Study 3 tested this model experimentally, introducing the 'anomie paradigm' to explore how perceptions of anomie cause shifts in psychology. Here, participants were exposed to a fictitious society characterized by high or low anomie. The high (relative to low) anomie condition increased support for redistribution through a desire for change but simultaneously decreased support via concerns over government misuse. These findings highlight how perceptions of societal breakdown can shape redistributive preferences through co-occurring psychological processes with opposing implications for policy support.

Indexed as

PoliticsSocial PerceptionSocioeconomic FactorsAdultFemaleHumansMaleUnited KingdomUnited StatesYoung Adultanomiedisintegrationdysregulationeconomic inequalityredistribution

Identifiers

PMID41906433
PMCPMC13033917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.