Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906364›Full record

ArticleJournal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS2026

A Next-Generation ELISA for the Detection of Anti-(Para)Nodal Antibodies in Autoimmune Nodopathy and COVID-19 Vaccinated Individuals.

Luise Appeltshauser, Chiara Ruprecht, Julia Reusch, Juliane Mees, Helena Glenewinkel, Claudia Sommer, Manuel Krone, Isabell Wagenhäuser, Kathrin Doppler, Nils Petri

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the peripheral nervous system : JPNS, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Luise AppeltshauserDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5248-4009
Chiara RuprechtDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Julia ReuschDepartment of General, Visceral, Transplantation, Vascular and Pediatric Surgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Juliane MeesCentral Laboratory Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-4383-3107
Helena GlenewinkelDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Claudia SommerDepartment of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine and Pain Medicine, Centre for Interdisciplinary Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Manuel KroneCentral Laboratory Unit, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Isabell WagenhäuserDepartment of Pediatrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Kathrin DopplerDepartment of Neurology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Nils PetriDepartment of Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Muskelkranke AP1/1German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) 01KX2021German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) 01KX2121Julius-Maximilians-Universität Würzburg
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimsAutoimmune nodopathy (AN) is a subtype of antibody-mediated inflammatory neuropathy targeting the node of Ranvier (NoR). Diagnosis requires detection of anti-(para)nodal autoantibodies like contactin-1 and neurofascin-155 via ELISA or cell-based assays, but protocols are inconsistent. Causes of node autoimmunity are unknown, and respiratory infections, including SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 vaccination as triggers, have not been thoroughly investigated. We aim to establish and validate a next-generation automated ELISA for anti-(para)nodal antibodies and investigate whether low-titer antibodies occur in recently COVID-19-vaccinated healthy individuals.

methodsWe used the Ella platform to customize an automated ELISA for anti-contactin-1, -neurofascin-155, and -Caspr-1 serum IgG. Patients with known AN (23 anti-neurofascin, 13 anti-contactin-1, and 8 anti-Caspr-1), 64 patients with seronegative (sub) acute inflammatory neuropathies, and 30 healthy controls served for validation, including quality analysis versus standard ELISA. Thirty-seven diagnostic samples of patients with suspected AN and 280 sera of healthcare workers included in the CoVacSer study, collected 3 weeks after COVID-19 vaccination or infection, were tested for anti-contactin-1 and anti-neurofascin-155.

resultsThe automated ELISA showed high sensitivity (87.5%-100%) and specificity (98.4%-100%) for identifying AN, with reduced hands-on time, high automation, and similar quality and titer characteristics as standard ELISA. Low-titer anti-neurofascin-155, but no anti-contactin-1 autoantibodies, were detected in 1/280 post-SARS-CoV-2-vaccination or infection sera (0.36%). Longitudinal testing and clinical assessment did not indicate SARS-CoV-2-related neurological symptoms.

interpretationWe provide a highly automated, rapid, universally applicable test platform for anti-(para)nodal antibodies. The low frequency of anti-(para)nodal antibodies and absence of clinical AN manifestations in COVID-19-vaccinated individuals support vaccination safety regarding AN development.

Indexed as

AutoantibodiesCOVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesAdultAgedCell Adhesion MoleculesContactin 1Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent AssayFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNerve Growth FactorsSARS-CoV-2AutoantibodiesCell Adhesion MoleculesContactin 1COVID-19 VaccinesNerve Growth FactorsNFASC protein, humanautoimmune nodopathycontactin‐1COVID‐19ELISAneurofascinSARS‐CoV‐2

Identifiers

PMID41906364
PMCPMC13033911

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.