Observational studyEuropean heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care2026
Point-of-care testing for pre-hospital stratification after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the RAPID-MIRACLE study.
Observational study in European heart journal. Acute cardiovascular care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Five Practical Considerations for the Management of Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest: Reflections from the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society Out-of-hospital Cardiac Arrest Focus Group.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
25 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsOut-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) has high mortality, and outcomes remain heterogeneous despite guidelines recommending universal conveyance to cardiac arrest centres. Early pre-hospital risk stratification may identify patients most likely to benefit. The pre-hospital utility of MIRACLE2 is unknown, so we evaluated the feasibility of rapid point-of-care testing to enable calculation of the MIRACLE2 score after return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). METHODS AND
resultsRAPID-MIRACLE was a prospective, multi-centre observational study conducted across London with the London Ambulance Service. Adult patients with suspected cardiac aetiology OHCA achieving sustained ROSC were enrolled. Pre-hospital point-of-care venous blood-gas sampling was performed with results blinded to receiving hospitals. We evaluated ROSC-MIRACLE2 incorporating post-ROSC pH, compared with a modified MIRACLE2 excluding pH (pre-MIRACLE2) and standard MIRACLE2 calculated on hospital admission. The primary outcome was poor neurological outcome at 30 days, defined as cerebral performance category (CPC) 3-5. Among 292 patients, 48% had poor neurological outcome. ROSC-MIRACLE2 demonstrated excellent discrimination [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92)], comparable to pre-MIRACLE2 [AUC 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92)], and admission MIRACLE2 [AUC 0.89 (95% CI 0.85-0.92)]. For ROSC-MIRACLE2, a threshold 0-2, the negative predictive value for good outcome was 0.89 (0.82-0.94). At a threshold ≥5, the positive predictive value was 0.88 (0.82-0.94). In a multi-variable regression model, post-ROSC pH was independently associated with poor neurological outcome and less than 3% of patients with a ROSC pH <7.00 had good neurological outcome.
conclusionIn this study, pre-hospital application of ROSC-MIRACLE2 enables early neurological risk stratification following resuscitated OHCA. Point-of-care pH improves prognostic precision, but is constrained by feasibility, whilst the simplified pre-MIRACLE2 score is more practical with comparable performance. Integration into OHCA care pathways may improve patient stratification and resource utilization but requires further study.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.