Observational studyEuropean journal of pain (London, England)2026
Placebo Effect on Pain-Related Autonomic Responses in a State of Experimentally-Induced Sensitization.
Observational study in European journal of pain (London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPain-related autonomic responses are increased after experimentally-induced secondary mechanical hyperalgesia (SMH), as well as in a variety of chronic pain cohorts. In this state of sensitization, negative expectations further amplify these enhanced responses. Whether these pain-related autonomic responses can also be modulated by positive expectations, i.e., placebo, was investigated in this experimental study.
methodsForty healthy participants (20 females) were recruited and assigned to either a PLACEBO or a CONTROL group. Pain ratings and skin conductance responses (SCR) were recorded in response to five pinprick stimuli applied to the volar forearm at three timepoints: before and after experimental heat pain, and after an inert cream was applied to the volar forearm with instructions to enhance expectation for pain relief and conditioning (i.e., PLACEBO) or neutral instructions and no conditioning (i.e., CONTROL).
resultsPain ratings and SCR increased in both the PLACEBO and CONTROL groups after the application of the heat pain model, signalling the induction of secondary mechanical hyperalgesia (all p's < 0.05). Both outcomes decreased after PLACEBO, returning to near baseline levels (both p's < 0.05). In contrast, SCR and pain ratings remained elevated in the CONTROL group. The decrease in pain ratings and SCR observed in the PLACBO group were, however, not correlated (p = 0.35).
conclusionsOur results show that positive expectations shape both psychophysical and physiological pain-related responses in a state of central sensitization. The lack of correlation between the placebo effect on pain ratings and on SCR implies different expectation-related modulatory processes on the two pain responses. SIGNIFICANCE: Our findings provide evidence that pain-related autonomic responses are modulated by expectations, even in a state of heightened sympathetic arousal, such as after experimentally-induced sensitization in healthy participants. In the context of clinical assessments, this implies that caution is warranted when interpreting unprocessed pain-related autonomic signals, such as SCR amplitudes, as surrogate markers of central sensitization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.