ArticleWomen's health (London, England)
What are women's experiences of gestational breast cancer, and how do they describe their interactions with the healthcare system? An exploratory study.
Article in Women's health (London, England). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundGestational breast cancer (GBC) is defined as a breast cancer diagnosis during pregnancy or within 12 months post-partum. The incidence of GBC varies between 1:1000 and 1:3000 pregnancies. Breast cancer is the most frequent malignant tumour in women and the leading cause of cancer-related female mortality worldwide.
objectivesThe main objective of this study was to better understand the experiences of women diagnosed with GBC and their interactions with the healthcare system. By exploring their perspectives, the study aimed to contribute to further research and knowledge to improve care and outcomes for these women.
designA qualitative exploratory study.
methodsThe study involved one-on-one semi-structured interviews conducted in Australia between November 2021 and June 2022. Participants were women diagnosed with GBC. Interviews were recorded digitally, transcribed verbatim, and analysed thematically following Braun and Clarke's (2006) six steps.
resultsSix women diagnosed with GBC participated in the study. Analysis determined three central themes. First:
conclusionThe findings provide an understanding of the unique challenges of women diagnosed with GBC. Empowering women through personalised knowledge about their disease, understanding their needs, discussing surgical options, addressing fertility preservation, and providing psychological support is essential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.