ArticleMagnetic resonance in medicine2026
Using U-Nets to Predict the Effects of Head Motion on Simulated Specific Absorption Rate for Ultra-High Field Magnetic Resonance Imaging With Parallel Transmission.
Article in Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeUltrahigh-field MRI requires careful management of the specific absorption rate (SAR), which is subject and subject-position dependent. Within-scan subject motion may exacerbate local SAR exposure, necessitating large safety margins to prevent SAR underestimation, which hampers imaging performance. This study proposes a U-Net architecture to adapt safety calculations to motion as it happens, to facilitate high-performance scanning without compromising safety.
methodsElectromagnetic simulations were performed for five body models at multiple positions with an 8-channel parallel-transmit coil. Q-matrices were transformed into real-valued SAR distributions-to train U-Nets to estimate motion-induced effects on local SAR-which were then mapped back to Q-matrices. Separate U-Nets were trained for different types of body motion (rightward/leftward/anterior/posterior/yaw), which were then cascaded to predict the effect of composite (off-axis) and larger displacements on SAR. Finally, network-estimated local SAR distributions were compared with ground truth after-motion local SAR for realistic parallel-transmit pulses.
resultsSubject motion had a statistically significant effect on local SAR, but network-estimated safety models recovered a faithful representation of the ground truth after-motion local SAR. For the investigated parallel-transmit pulses, the proposed approach reduced the safety margin from 2.14-fold to 1.3-fold and ensured more than 68% of the imaging performance could be realized while a safety model that includes all simulated subject positions would have limited scanning performance to as low as 21% of the maximum.
conclusionsThe proposed position-aware SAR calculation approach allows smaller safety margins, which has the potential to enable higher-performance UHF-MRI scanning without compromising safety for subjects who are unable to remain still.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.