ArticleClinical oral implants research2026
The Role of the Keratinized Mucosa in Peri-Implant Diseases Onset and Brushing Discomfort: A 10-Year Follow-Up.
Article in Clinical oral implants research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesTo evaluate the effect of narrow (< 2 mm) and wide (≥ 2 mm) keratinized mucosa (KM) over 10 years on peri-implant diagnosis and brushing discomfort. MATERIALS AND
methodsEighty patients were initially evaluated. Demographic data, modified plaque index (mPI)/plaque index (PI), probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level (CAL), mucosal recession (REC), bleeding on probing (BoP), marginal bone level (MBL), brushing discomfort (BD), and peri-implant diagnosis were assessed. Implants were then divided into two groups according to the width of KM (narrow group: NG < 2 mm and wide group: WG ≥ 2 mm). Patients who returned after 4 years (T4) were invited to participate in the 10-year reassessment (T10). The same parameters were reassessed, and statistical analysis was performed.
resultsThirty patients and 116 implants were included in this 10-year follow-up study. Although at T10 the prevalence of peri-implant diseases was not influenced by the KM width, the implants in the WG had 84% lower odds of being diagnosed with peri-implant diseases compared to those in the NG. Furthermore, the NG had higher PI, mPI, BoP, and REC than the WG. In addition, significant MBL was observed in the NG over 10 years. Both groups reduced BD, with no significant difference between them.
conclusionA narrow KM favors plaque accumulation, mucosal recession, and peri-implant tissue inflammation in the long term, while a wider KM (≥ 2 mm) appears protective against peri-implant disease onset. Brushing discomfort declined over time irrespective of KM width.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.