ArticlePsychophysiology2026
Late Positive Potentials as an Index of "Desirably Difficult" Learning Processes Engaged During Language Comprehension: ERP Evidence From Studies of Domain Knowledge.
Article in Psychophysiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Sex Differences Influence ERP Components in Semantic Decisions.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Electrophysiological evidence for age-related changes in event knowledge use during language comprehension.Psychology and aging · 2026Article
- Regression analyses of event-related brain potentials dissociate general reading experience and domain-specific knowledge sources during language comprehension.Frontiers in cognition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrophysiological studies of language comprehension have primarily examined the kind of information that comes to mind, and when, as people process words and build message-level understanding. However, less is known about the factors that allow people to commit the message-level information to memory for future use. One promising marker of such explicit memory processes is the late positive component (LPC), an event-related brain potential (ERP) effect linked to recollection in the memory literature and predictive of memory performance at timescales ranging from minutes to months. Here, we examine LPCs, alongside N400 brain potentials (sensitive probes of implicit semantic processing), to investigate the hypothesis that domain knowledge influences explicit memory mechanisms during comprehension. We re-analyzed three existing datasets in which young adults with varying domain knowledge about a fictional book series read short descriptions of fictional "facts" about that domain while ERPs were recorded. As predicted, correct completions of these facts elicited larger LPCs as a function of individuals' overall domain knowledge. We also assessed item-level difficulty using completion norms from an independent peer group. More difficult facts engendered larger LPCs-but only in individuals with relatively greater domain knowledge. By contrast, N400 amplitudes, reflecting implicit, real-time lexico-semantic activation, were modulated by item-level difficulty for individuals with weaker knowledge but to a much lesser degree for those with stronger knowledge. These findings demonstrate that domain-specific knowledge shapes not only what information can be implicitly accessed in the moment, but also whether explicit memory mechanisms are immediately engaged. Consistent with the memory literature, we propose that explicit (possibly intentional) memory processes support deeper encoding when input is "desirably difficult" based on an individual's knowledge base. Because these effects appear only in knowledgeable individuals, we suggest they reflect a strengthening of relational memory between in-the-moment linguistic input and extant knowledge networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.