ArticleBMC medical education2026
The virtual hospital as a means for undergraduate medical students to practice clinical reasoning: a qualitative interview study.
Article in BMC medical education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Artificially Intelligent Simulated Patients in Undergraduate Surgical Teaching: A Single Blinded Randomized Controlled Study.The clinical teacher · 2026Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEntering the clinical environment presents medical students with several challenges. They need to understand the organization of a hospital ward and practice clinical decision making; that is, to learn clinical competencies. It may be beneficial for students to also practice clinical competencies in a simulated environment. The virtual hospital is a digital educational tool, in which 3-year undergraduate medical students meet, diagnose, and treat fictive patients suffering from infectious diseases. The students work with the virtual hospital in a seminar-like setting with other students under supervision of clinical teachers. Three group sessions are held during the course of one week where students can follow patient progress each day in real time and follow up on initiated treatments. The aim of this study was to explore experiences of the virtual hospital among students and clinical teachers.
methodsThis qualitative interview study was set at an academic teaching hospital in Gothenburg, Sweden. Based on an interview guide, medical students (n=6) and clinical teachers (n=6) were interviewed. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and subject to qualitative content analysis.
resultsStudents experienced the virtual hospital to be highly educational, as well as realistic and engaging. They raised how open discussions were allowed and encouraged, and inherently student-centered. Teachers experienced the virtual hospital as having learning in focus and that the many disturbances of a regular clinical ward were absent. They found the virtual hospital to be user-friendly, instructive and enjoyable and that the teaching method in itself directed them into a student-centered manner.
conclusionBoth students and teachers were highly appreciative of using the virtual hospital as a learning activity and teaching method. The study suggests that the virtual hospital is suitable for students in the early clinical phase of medical education as it introduces clinical routines and practices in a controlled manner. The virtual hospital proved effective in introducing undergraduate medical students to clinical reasoning and may act as a complement to regular clinical rotations. There is great potential in the virtual hospital, as it is flexible and can be adapted to other medical areas and settings, other educational programs, and interprofessional education.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.