ArticleBMC cancer2026
Exploring psychological distress, appraisal, and coping during the scan result journey: a qualitative study of young and middle-aged Chinese adults with advanced cancer.
Article in BMC cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundScan-related distress is common in patients with advanced cancer. Young and middle-aged Chinese patients influenced by Confucian culture and identity stages may experience unique psychological distress following the scans.
aimTo investigate the psychological distress and coping strategies in young and middle-aged Chinese patients with advanced cancer during the period from the scan result waiting phase to disclosure.
methodsA descriptive qualitative method guided by Lazarus and Folkman’s stress and coping theory was used. Nineteen young and middle-aged patients with advanced cancer participated in semi-structured interviews, and data were analyzed using direct content analysis.
resultsThe scan results journey was perceived as a threat by patients, generating various emotional distress, including “waiting anxiety,” confusion regarding imaging reports, and acute or chronic reactions. Resource assessment involves a tendency toward self-reliance, ambivalence toward family support, and a perception of the internet as an accessible yet untrustworthy resource. Ultimately, both emotion-oriented coping strategies, such as spiritual coping, cognitive reframing, and emotional suppression, and problem-oriented approaches, including seeking explanations and repeated confirmation, deliberately distancing themselves from result disclosure, and surrendering autonomy in scan management, were employed to alleviate psychological distress.
conclusionUnder the influence of Confucian philosophy and social identity, young and middle-aged patients demonstrated self-resilience in the scan results journey. While some coping strategies alleviated emotional distress in the short term, their prolonged use risks suppressing negative emotions and delaying treatment. Future initiatives should prioritize the early identification of scan-related emotional distress and the development of culturally sensitive psychological support interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.