Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906103›Full record

ArticleBMC pediatrics2026

Assessing key mental health-related lifestyle behaviours and experiences in a single scale: a validation of the Personal Experiences in Everyday Life (PEEL) questionnaire.

P Tang, K Kostyrka-Allchorne, A Murray, M Stoilova, E Azeri, S Livingstone, E Sonuga-Barke

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

P TangDepartment of Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
K Kostyrka-AllchorneDepartment of Psychology, School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK. k.kostyrka-allchorne@qmul.ac.uk.
A MurraySchool of Psychology, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
M StoilovaDepartment of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
E AzeriDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
S LivingstoneDepartment of Media and Communications, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
E Sonuga-BarkeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdolescence is a period of heightened vulnerability to mental health problems, with lifestyle habits and negative social experiences representing both risk and resilience factors. Existing tools typically assess a limited range of such habits and experiences. The Personal Experiences in Everyday Life (PEEL) questionnaire is a brief measure of key modifiable lifestyle behaviours and negative social experiences. We examined its psychometric properties and associations with symptoms of depression, anxiety, and psychological wellbeing.

methodsTwo community samples, a mid-adolescent (n = 552; mean age = 13.7, SD = 0.5, range 13–14; 48% female) and a late-adolescent sample (n = 383; mean age = 19.0, SD = 1.7, range 16–25; 76% female), were recruited from secondary schools/universities and completed the PEEL, assessing positive (e.g., ‘Sport/exercise’) and risky (e.g., ‘Smoking/vaping) lifestyle behaviours, and negative social experiences (e.g., ‘Being bullied’). We examined the PEEL’s factor structure, internal consistency, test-retest reliability and the associations with mental health and wellbeing, including moderation by sex and developmental stage. The RCADS-25 and DASS-21 measured depressive and anxiety symptoms; scores were standardised (z-scores) and pooled.

resultsA three-factor solution for the PEEL items was supported across both samples: Positive Activities, Unhealthy Diet, and Risky Activities. For conceptual clarity, Risky Activities were divided into Substance Use and Negative Social Experiences, yielding four internally consistent subscales with good test-retest reliability. All factors were significantly associated with depression, anxiety, and wellbeing; Negative Social Experiences showed the strongest associations with depression and anxiety. Stronger positive associations between Substance Use and anxiety were evident in females, and stronger negative associations between Substance Use and Negative Social Experiences with wellbeing were seen in males. Stronger associations between Negative Social Experiences and depression and anxiety occurred in younger adolescents. Unhealthy Diet was positively associated with wellbeing in younger adolescents but negatively associated in older adolescents.

conclusionsThe PEEL is an efficient and valid measure of adolescents’ lifestyle behaviours and negative social experiences. Negative social experiences accounted for much of the observed associations with mental health, highlighting the role of social context alongside lifestyle behaviours. The PEEL may support research seeking to understand or modify lifestyle and social drivers of adolescent mental health.

Indexed as

Life StyleMental HealthAdolescentAdultAnxietyDepressionFemaleHumansMalePsychological Well-BeingPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and QuestionnairesYoung AdultAdolescenceAnxietyDepressionLifestyle behavioursNegative social experiencesPsychometricsWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID41906103
PMCPMC13154467

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.