Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906101›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026

3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial.

Xinxu Ou, Qianqi Qiu, Xien Yang, Yu Gao, Gaolong Zhang, Na Zhang, Jianhua Liu, Siyi Zhang, Wei Wei, Yingyi Xu

Abstract readRandomized Controlled TrialComparative Study
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Xinxu Ou *Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0005-9965-7241
Qianqi Qiu *Department of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5809-3770
Xien YangPaediatrics School, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.
Yu GaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Gaolong ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Na ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Jianhua LiuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Siyi ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China.
Wei WeiDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China. 475741131@qq.com.
Yingyi XuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Guangzhou Women and Children's Medical Center, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510623, China. xuyingyi@gzhmu.edu.cn.

Funding

Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Joint Fund of Enterprise) 2024A1515220048Guangzhou Health Science and Technology Project 20241A011036Guangzhou Joint Funding Program of Academic Institutions and Enterprises for Basic and Applied Basic Research 2025A03J4364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indispensable for intraoperative guidance and evaluation in pediatric cardiac surgery. While simulation-based medical education offers a promising alternative to the traditional apprenticeship model, evidence directly comparing its efficacy in improving live pediatric TEE performance remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether simulation-based training using a 3D pediatric TEE simulator is superior to traditional apprenticeship training for enhancing clinical TEE proficiency among anesthesia residents.

methodsFirst- through third-year anesthesia resident physicians without prior echocardiography experience were randomized into two groups. All participants first completed a standardized 2-hour web-based foundational course. Subsequently, the intervention group (Simulation group, Group S; n = 22) received 1 h of supervised hands-on practice using the BabyWorks® simulator, while the control group (Traditional group, Group T; n = 22) received 1 h of bedside apprenticeship training on live patients. One week later, all participants were assessed on their ability to independently acquire 11 standardized TEE views in pediatric patients. Performance was scored across three dimensions (imaging angle, anatomical structure, and image clarity), with a maximum total score of 110 points. The total examination duration (time) was also recorded.

resultsBaseline knowledge scores were comparable between groups. In the clinical assessment, Group S achieved significantly higher total performance scores than Group T (Group S: 88.60 ± 15.60 vs. Group T: 64.70 ± 16.70; p < 0.001). Group S also demonstrated shorter examination durations (Group S: 447.60s vs. Group T: 584.50s; p = 0.007). Specifically, Group S significantly outperformed Group T in 7 of the 11 anatomical landmarks (p < 0.05), primarily in the technically demanding transgastric and advanced mid-esophageal views. Regarding dimensions, Group S scored higher in angle (p = 0.031), clarity (p < 0.001), and structures (p < 0.001).

conclusionIn summary, this trial provides robust evidence that 3D simulation training significantly improves live TEE performance among novice operators compared to conventional training, contributing valuable insights toward optimizing echocardiography education and enhancing perioperative safety in pediatric cardiac care.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn). Registration number: ChiCTR2500105325. Date of the study first posted on ChiCTR.org.cn: 2025-07-02. Date of the enrolment of the first research participant: 202507-03.

Indexed as

AnesthesiologyClinical CompetenceEchocardiography, TransesophagealHeart Defects, CongenitalInternship and ResidencySimulation TrainingChildFemaleHumansMalepediatric patientperi-operative safeSimulation trainingTEE

Identifiers

PMID41906101
PMCPMC13151222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.