Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2026
3D models and simulations training improves TEE performance on pediatric patients with simple valvular congenital heart disease compared to traditional apprenticeship training: a clinical randomized controlled trial.
Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundTransesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is indispensable for intraoperative guidance and evaluation in pediatric cardiac surgery. While simulation-based medical education offers a promising alternative to the traditional apprenticeship model, evidence directly comparing its efficacy in improving live pediatric TEE performance remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether simulation-based training using a 3D pediatric TEE simulator is superior to traditional apprenticeship training for enhancing clinical TEE proficiency among anesthesia residents.
methodsFirst- through third-year anesthesia resident physicians without prior echocardiography experience were randomized into two groups. All participants first completed a standardized 2-hour web-based foundational course. Subsequently, the intervention group (Simulation group, Group S; n = 22) received 1 h of supervised hands-on practice using the BabyWorks® simulator, while the control group (Traditional group, Group T; n = 22) received 1 h of bedside apprenticeship training on live patients. One week later, all participants were assessed on their ability to independently acquire 11 standardized TEE views in pediatric patients. Performance was scored across three dimensions (imaging angle, anatomical structure, and image clarity), with a maximum total score of 110 points. The total examination duration (time) was also recorded.
resultsBaseline knowledge scores were comparable between groups. In the clinical assessment, Group S achieved significantly higher total performance scores than Group T (Group S: 88.60 ± 15.60 vs. Group T: 64.70 ± 16.70; p < 0.001). Group S also demonstrated shorter examination durations (Group S: 447.60s vs. Group T: 584.50s; p = 0.007). Specifically, Group S significantly outperformed Group T in 7 of the 11 anatomical landmarks (p < 0.05), primarily in the technically demanding transgastric and advanced mid-esophageal views. Regarding dimensions, Group S scored higher in angle (p = 0.031), clarity (p < 0.001), and structures (p < 0.001).
conclusionIn summary, this trial provides robust evidence that 3D simulation training significantly improves live TEE performance among novice operators compared to conventional training, contributing valuable insights toward optimizing echocardiography education and enhancing perioperative safety in pediatric cardiac care.
trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR.org.cn). Registration number: ChiCTR2500105325. Date of the study first posted on ChiCTR.org.cn: 2025-07-02. Date of the enrolment of the first research participant: 202507-03.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.