ArticleBMC public health2026
Associations between park visitation and physical, mental and social health among older adults.
Article in BMC public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundPopulation ageing is a growing public health concern. Parks can play a central role in promoting healthy ageing by offering accessible spaces for physical activity, social interaction, and mental restoration. However, little is known about how older adults use parks across seasons, what activities they engage in, and who they visit with and how this differs according to season and health status. Associations between older adults’ park visitation and health are not well explored, and little is known about reasons for non-visitation. This study among older adults aimed to (1) describe park visitation (frequency, duration, accompaniment, activities) across all seasons and by health status; (2) examine associations of total park visitation frequency and duration with self-reported physical, mental, and social health; and (3) describe reasons for non-visitation.
methodsOlder adults (n = 235) in Belgium reported their park visitation, health, and demographics. Using the Public Participatory Geographic Information Systems tool “My Green Place”, participants indicated the park that they visited most often or that they did not visit parks. Those who indicated that they were park visitors, completed questions concerning their park visitation and non-visitors reported reasons for not visiting. Descriptive statistics, Mann-Whitney U tests, and chi-square tests were performed (aims 1 and 3). Logistic regression models were fitted to examine associations of total year-round park visitation frequency (# visits/year) and duration (hours per visit/year) with physical, mental, and social health and loneliness (aim 2).
resultsMost participants (61%) visited year-round, especially in summer and spring. Park visitation frequency and duration were highest among participants who visited year-round. At least half of the sample visited parks alone across all seasons. Walking, sitting, listening to nature, and socialising were the most common activities. Reasons why non-visitors did not visit parks were primarily personal (e.g., physical disability, health reasons) or park related. There were limited associations observed between park visitation and health.
conclusionsOur findings may help with planning park programming activities and informing important park features that cater to older adults’ needs, ensuring that parks support older adults’ healthy ageing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.