Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906065›Full record

ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026

Anatomists' experience and perspectives on the international transfer of human remains for the purpose of education.

Jackie Hazelhurst, Jon Cornwall, Brandi Schmitt, Brendon Billings, Susana Biasutto, Andreas Winkelmann, Jian Yang, Laura Johnson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jackie HazelhurstCentre for Early Learning in Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand.
Jon CornwallCentre for Early Learning in Medicine, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, Dunedin, Aotearoa, New Zealand.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4607-3988
Brandi SchmittUniversity of California Health, University of California Office of the President, Oakland, California, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-6209-7952
Brendon BillingsDepartment of Anatomical Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8443-0758
Susana BiasuttoChair of Normal Anatomy and Body Donation Program, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National University of Cordoba, Cordoba, Argentina.
Andreas WinkelmannInstitute of Anatomy, Brandenburg Medical School, Neuruppin, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1047-2477
Jian YangSchool of Biomedical Sciences, LKS Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-8973-148X
Laura JohnsonDepartment of Cell Systems and Anatomy, Joe R. and Teresa Long School of Medicine, The University of Texas at San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4396-9172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anecdotally, educational institutions without access to human remains may choose to import these from other countries; however, there is currently no published information illuminating the existence of this trade. This study therefore aimed to document the nature of international transfer of human remains for education, and explore anatomists' perspectives toward the practice. Between September and December 2024, a 16-item on-line survey including questions (multichoice, free-text) on importation practice and frequency, use, and ethical considerations around the international trade of human remains in education was distributed internationally through anatomy associations and word-of-mouth. Following data curation, 183 responses were analyzed. Few (15%) stated importation to their institution occurs, with such use being primarily for surgical device (42%) or clinical skills (37%) training. Several ethical concerns around importation were identified, including predominant themes "Consent and Authority" and "Ethical Supply and Use," which primarily concerned issues of informed consent and documented provenance. A peripheral theme of "Donor Recognition" was identified, highlighting issues where donor culture and/or religion was not congruent with those of the user. The theme "Perception of Risk" relayed ethical concerns around disease spread. Development of further guidance was suggested around professional standards and international regulations for transfer of human remains, and increased discussion surrounding potential ethical issues. Findings suggest additional work is needed to address several issues around the international transfer of human remains for education, including raising awareness of ethical issues, development and communication of improved standards for organizations transferring human remains, and supporting development of local body donation programs.

Indexed as

AnatomistsAnatomyCadaverHumansInformed ConsentSurveys and Questionnairesanatomy educationbody donationbody donorcommercializationcommodificationethics

Identifiers

PMID41906065
PMCPMC13332509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.