ArticleAnatomical sciences education2026
Anatomists' experience and perspectives on the international transfer of human remains for the purpose of education.
Article in Anatomical sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Ethical-legal vulnerability in body procurement across national contexts.Anatomical sciences education · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anecdotally, educational institutions without access to human remains may choose to import these from other countries; however, there is currently no published information illuminating the existence of this trade. This study therefore aimed to document the nature of international transfer of human remains for education, and explore anatomists' perspectives toward the practice. Between September and December 2024, a 16-item on-line survey including questions (multichoice, free-text) on importation practice and frequency, use, and ethical considerations around the international trade of human remains in education was distributed internationally through anatomy associations and word-of-mouth. Following data curation, 183 responses were analyzed. Few (15%) stated importation to their institution occurs, with such use being primarily for surgical device (42%) or clinical skills (37%) training. Several ethical concerns around importation were identified, including predominant themes "Consent and Authority" and "Ethical Supply and Use," which primarily concerned issues of informed consent and documented provenance. A peripheral theme of "Donor Recognition" was identified, highlighting issues where donor culture and/or religion was not congruent with those of the user. The theme "Perception of Risk" relayed ethical concerns around disease spread. Development of further guidance was suggested around professional standards and international regulations for transfer of human remains, and increased discussion surrounding potential ethical issues. Findings suggest additional work is needed to address several issues around the international transfer of human remains for education, including raising awareness of ethical issues, development and communication of improved standards for organizations transferring human remains, and supporting development of local body donation programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.