ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026
Cavir: confidence-aware vision-based registration for image-guided surgery.
Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeSurgical navigation depends on precise image-to-patient registration, yet line-of-sight issues on the tracker, anatomy deformation, and occlusion from instruments and the surrounding environment degrade accuracy and lead to failing scenarios. We target a tracker-free, robust, and explainable vision-based framework for complex operative scenes.
methodsWe fuse accurate depth estimation with dense 2D point tracking to recover temporally consistent 3D surface motion from surgical video, continuously updating image-to-patient registration. We also present the registration error detection module where we evaluate tracking quality, motion consistency, and 3D motion agreement to rapidly detect and attribute errors (e.g., occlusion, or drift). If an error is detected, the module also disables the mesh overlay.
resultsAcross three phantom scenarios (tool-occluded, layer-occluded, and deformed), our method improves target registration accuracy and robustness compared to the traditional method (ICP) and the learning-based baseline (PREDATOR), particularly under partial occlusion and moderate non-rigid manipulation. On the live-porcine sequence, our proposed method delivers higher accuracy and approximately 20
conclusionsOur proposed method, coupled with explainable error detection, maintains registration while reducing reliance on external trackers, contributing to the ongoing effort to build trustworthy, resilient image-guided surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41906062What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.