Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906062›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery2026

Cavir: confidence-aware vision-based registration for image-guided surgery.

Hisashi Ishida, Yuechao Lu, Pourya Shirazian

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of computer assisted radiology and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hisashi IshidaDepartment of Computer Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, 21218, USA. hishida3@jhu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6186-1838
Yuechao LuIntuitive, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086, USA.
Pourya ShirazianIntuitive, 1020 Kifer Road, Sunnyvale, CA, 94086, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSurgical navigation depends on precise image-to-patient registration, yet line-of-sight issues on the tracker, anatomy deformation, and occlusion from instruments and the surrounding environment degrade accuracy and lead to failing scenarios. We target a tracker-free, robust, and explainable vision-based framework for complex operative scenes.

methodsWe fuse accurate depth estimation with dense 2D point tracking to recover temporally consistent 3D surface motion from surgical video, continuously updating image-to-patient registration. We also present the registration error detection module where we evaluate tracking quality, motion consistency, and 3D motion agreement to rapidly detect and attribute errors (e.g., occlusion, or drift). If an error is detected, the module also disables the mesh overlay.

resultsAcross three phantom scenarios (tool-occluded, layer-occluded, and deformed), our method improves target registration accuracy and robustness compared to the traditional method (ICP) and the learning-based baseline (PREDATOR), particularly under partial occlusion and moderate non-rigid manipulation. On the live-porcine sequence, our proposed method delivers higher accuracy and approximately 20

conclusionsOur proposed method, coupled with explainable error detection, maintains registration while reducing reliance on external trackers, contributing to the ongoing effort to build trustworthy, resilient image-guided surgery.

Indexed as

Imaging, Three-DimensionalSurgery, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsAnimalsHumansPhantoms, ImagingImage-guided surgeryLaparoscopyRegistration

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.