ArticleOral and maxillofacial surgery2026
Challenging reconstruction of oncologic defects of the parotid region: a single-institution experience and decision-making framework proposal.
Article in Oral and maxillofacial surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Immediate Facial Reanimation After Radical Parotidectomy for Malignancy: Oncologic Principles and Reconstructive Strategy.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesReconstruction of the parotid region presents challenges due to the area’s complex anatomy. A classification of defects from ablative surgery can simplify and systematize the reconstructive approach. This study aims to propose a structured decision-making framework to guide reconstructive planning. MATERIALS AND
methodsA retrospective study was conducted on patients with malignant parotid tumors treated at Policlinico Umberto I between 2013 and 2023. Non-malignant tumors were excluded. The analysis focused on the involvement of skin, soft tissue, bone, and nerves, the type of parotidectomy (superficial, total, extended), whether neck dissection was performed, and the type of reconstruction used.
resultsSixty-seven patients (mean age 55 ± 16 years) were included. Primary closure was performed in 42 cases (62.7%). Thirteen patients (19.4%) required reconstruction of soft tissue and/or bony defects, including local cervicofacial flaps (n = 2), pedicled locoregional flaps (n = 4), free flaps (n = 2), deep circumflex iliac artery free flaps (n = 2), and pectoralis major myocutaneous flaps (n = 3), with one secondary free scapular flap after iliac crest failure. Facial nerve resection was necessary in 25 patients (37%). Immediate facial nerve reconstruction was achieved with direct neurorrhaphy or interposition grafting in 11 cases and with nerve transfers (masseteric-to-facial or hypoglossal-to-facial) in 5 cases. Static facial reanimation procedures were performed in 9 patients, either alone or in combination.
conclusionsSuccessful parotid reconstruction focuses on minimizing skin tension, addressing color mismatch, restoring volume, and preserving nerve function. Based on this experience, we propose a practical decision-making framework tailored to defect volume and functional loss involving skin/soft tissue, bone, and nerve.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.