Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906035›Full record

ArticleDocumenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology2026

Anomalous contrast as an adaptive violation of the Talbot-Plateau law.

Ernest Greene, Jack Morrison

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Documenta ophthalmologica. Advances in ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ernest GreeneDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Jack MorrisonDepartment of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. egreene@usc.edu.

Funding

Neuropsychology Foundation 0000Quest for Truth Foundation 0000
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo better understand anomalous contrast mechanisms that allow flicker-fused stimuli to be visible even when they provide the same physical contrast as background.

methodStimulus flicker was used to elicit differential activation of ON and OFF retinal channels at frequencies above the flicker-fusion threshold. Providing balanced light energy to ON and OFF channels will normally cause the stimulus to vanish into the background.

resultsWe used ultrabrief bright pulses, combined with ultralong dark pulses, to elicit "anomalous contrast" that rendered the stimulus visible, even though it had the same average luminance as the background. The duration and intensity of flicker components were varied to gain insight into the conditions that would elicit this effect.

conclusionsAnomalous contrast displays violated the Talbot-Plateau law, but in doing so, provided an adaptive way to register and signal contours that matched background luminance. These findings contribute additional details about this visual adaptation, and we discuss how the retinal circuitry provides for stimulus visibility.

Indexed as

Adaptation, OcularContrast SensitivityFlicker FusionRetinaHumansPhotic StimulationSensory ThresholdsAnomalous contrastFlickerON/OFF channelsTalbot-PlateauUltrabrief pulses

Identifiers

PMID41906035
PMCPMC13506609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.