Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41906013›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Evaluating cross-dataset transfer learning for photoplethysmography-based blood pressure estimation.

Yoon Chul Kim, Hyun Jae Baek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yoon Chul KimDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea.
Hyun Jae BaekDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Soonchunhyang University, Asan, Chungnam, Republic of Korea. hjbaek@sch.ac.kr.

Funding

BK21 Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research (FOUR) BK21 Fostering Outstanding Universities for Research (FOUR)National Research Foundation of Korea National Research Foundation of Korea
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Non-invasive, continuous blood pressure (BP) monitoring using photoplethysmography (PPG) remains challenging due to limited subject-specific data and domain shifts between recording environments. This study evaluates the performance of cross-dataset transfer learning for BP estimation. We developed a compact version of the BP-CRNN model with reduced trainable parameters to allow effective training on small datasets. Experiments were conducted using the MIMIC-III and VitalDB databases, which include PPG signals and continuous invasive BP measurements. Pre-trained models were first established on one dataset and then fine-tuned using subject-specific data from the other dataset. The cross-dataset transfer learning approach, evaluated on 200 patients, achieved mean absolute errors of 3.36 mmHg for systolic and 1.81 mmHg for diastolic BP, reflecting an approximately 13% improvement over models trained without transfer learning. These results satisfy the AAMI and BHS standards. The performance gap between cross-dataset and intra-dataset transfer learning was within 1% and not statistically significant. These findings demonstrate that cross-dataset transfer learning can effectively leverage knowledge from large-scale medical datasets to improve BP estimation accuracy, particularly in domains with limited data availability and varying measurement conditions.

Indexed as

Blood PressureBlood Pressure DeterminationPhotoplethysmographyDatabases, FactualFemaleHumansMaleTransfer Machine LearningBlood pressure estimationCross-dataset validationDeep learningPhotoplethysmography (PPG)Transfer learning

Identifiers

PMID41906013
PMCPMC13039200

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.