ArticleScientific reports2026
Remote sensing-based landslide prediction and risk assessment using a hybrid CNN-LSTM deep learning model.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Landslide susceptibility assessment is essential for risk mitigation in regions affected by complex terrain and variable environmental conditions. This study proposes a hybrid deep learning framework based on a Convolutional Neural Network and Long Short-Term Memory (CNN–LSTM) architecture to integrate spatial and temporal information for landslide susceptibility mapping using remote sensing data. Spatial features were extracted from satellite imagery and digital elevation models, while temporal patterns were characterized using rainfall and reservoir-level time series. The proposed model was applied to Kerman Province, Iran, and evaluated using an independent test dataset of historical landslide events. The CNN–LSTM model achieved an accuracy of 95.6%, an F1-score of 93.5%, and an AUC of 0.98, outperforming traditional machine learning models and standalone deep learning approaches. The resulting susceptibility maps effectively identified high-risk zones consistent with historical landslide occurrences, demonstrating the benefit of integrating spatiotemporal information for regional-scale landslide susceptibility assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.