ArticleNPJ microgravity2026
Kinematic analysis of the European Enhanced Exploration Exercise Device in unpowered mode.
Article in NPJ microgravity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Unlike earlier short-duration lunar missions, current exploration-class missions include extended periods of microgravity exposure prior to lunar surface operations. Current exercise systems on the International Space Station are bulky and power-intensive, limiting their applicability for deep space missions. The European Enhanced Exploration Exercise Device (E4D) addresses these constraints by combining aerobic and resistive exercises in a compact, multifunctional device. This study compared kinematics and perceived exertion between exercises performed on E4D's unpowered mode and conventional gym equipment. Fourteen participants performed rowing, seated row, deadlifts, and bench press under both conditions while wearing a sensor-based motion capture system. Differences in joint angles, angular velocities, and perceived exertion were observed, likely influenced by variations in ergonomics, force production mechanics, and load distribution. Whilst differences were significant, full-body aerobic and resistive exercises were possible using a single device without a motor to generate resistance, relevant for missions with volume and power constraints.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.