ArticleScientific reports2026
Multi-scalar risk drivers for a heat vulnerability assessment framework using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study aims to address the challenge of quantifying amplified heat-related health risks in tropical nations by developing and validating a novel, data-driven framework in Malaysia to deconstruct the complex interplay between social vulnerability and environmental exposure. Methodologically, we constructed a Heat Vulnerability Index (HVI) and employed a Random Forest model to systematically evaluate whether integrating HVI with local land surface physical characteristics or with ambient atmospheric conditions (Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), Ozone, [Formula: see text]) yielded superior all-caused mortality prediction. The findings reveal that the framework incorporating ambient atmospheric conditions achieved superior predictive power ([Formula: see text]=0.8623), with the HVI, Ozone, and UTCI identified as the dominant predictors, while SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis further uncovered significant spatial heterogeneity in their impacts on mortality. Ultimately, this research provides a robust, evidence-based tool for policymakers, demonstrating that in a tropical context, combining macro-scale ambient atmospheric conditions with intrinsic social vulnerability is the most effective strategy for identifying high-risk communities and prioritizing targeted interventions, establishing a transferable protocol to mitigate heat-related health risks across the broader tropical zone.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.