Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41905983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

A brain-inspired computational framework for image-based risk assessment.

Feng Zhou, Shijing Hu, Xiaozheng Du, Nan Li, Tongming Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Feng ZhouSchool of Artificial Intelligence, Shanghai Normal University Tianhua College, No. 1661 Shengxin North Road, Shanghai, 201815, China.
Shijing HuCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Xiaozheng DuCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China. xzdu23@m.fudan.edu.cn.
Nan LiBusiness Analysis BU, GienTech Technology Co., Ltd, Shanghai, 200232, China. nan.li96@gientech.com.
Tongming ZhouCollege of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skin cancer risk prediction plays a critical role in early diagnosis and personalized healthcare. However, existing approaches often struggle to achieve both rich feature representation and computational efficiency. To address these issues, this study proposes Bicom, a brain-inspired framework for skin cancer risk prediction that integrates efficient attention mechanisms, multi-scale feature fusion, and confidence-aware refinement. Specifically, we develop F-ResNeSt, a multi-scale feature-extraction architecture that enhances the ResNeSt backbone by incorporating a Feature Pyramid Network (FPN) and Linformer-based linear-complexity attention. In addition, we propose L-CoAtNet, an optimized classification network that replaces conventional relative attention with Linformer-based attention to achieve scalable global contextual modeling. Furthermore, a brain-inspired Spiking Neural Network (SNN) module is introduced as a confidence-aware refinement mechanism to enhance prediction reliability for ambiguous samples. Comprehensive experiments on public and subject datasets demonstrate that the proposed framework achieves consistently competitive performance across multiple evaluation metrics, indicating its effectiveness, robustness, and scalability for assisted skin cancer risk prediction.

Indexed as

BrainSkin NeoplasmsAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerRisk AssessmentBrain-inspired computingDisease risk predictionImage classificationSkin cancer risk predictionVisual inspection

Identifiers

PMID41905983
PMCPMC13039722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.