ArticleScientific reports2026
Characterization, immune cell phenotyping and differential gene expression analysis of brain metastases and primary breast cancer samples.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer is well recognized, but research has largely focused on primary tumors, while metastatic lesions, particularly brain metastases (BM), remain understudied. With the rising incidence of BM in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and their poor prognosis, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving BM formation, progression, and immune evasion is crucial for developing better therapeutic strategies. We performed an integrated analysis of BM and matched primary breast tumors using immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) quantification, and bulk RNA sequencing. Tumor receptor status, gene expression profiles, immune cell composition, and pathway alterations were analyzed in ten patients with paired samples. Changes in receptor status were observed between primary tumors and BM, including alterations in estrogen receptor and HER2 expression. RNA sequencing revealed differentially expressed genes and pathways, with an apparent downregulation of immune-related genes in BM. Immune profiling suggested a shift in the tumor microenvironment, with BM showing lower B- and CD8 + T-cell infiltration and a relative increase in M2 macrophages and follicular helper T-cells. While these findings are descriptive and limited by sample size, they point towards a potentially more immunosuppressive milieu in BM that may contribute to immune evasion and reduced responsiveness to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Our study highlights molecular and immunological differences between primary breast tumors and BM. The altered immune landscape in BM, characterized by diminished TIL infiltration and an increase in immunosuppressive cells, warrants further investigation in larger, more homogeneous cohorts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.