Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41905976›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Characterization, immune cell phenotyping and differential gene expression analysis of brain metastases and primary breast cancer samples.

Franz Josef Gassner, Gabriel Rinnerthaler, Vanessa Castagnaviz, Alejandra Gonzalez-Martinez, Thomas Parigger, Stephan Drothler, Richard Greil, Roland Geisberger, Theo F J Kraus, Alexander Romagna and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Franz Josef GassnerCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Gabriel RinnerthalerCancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Vanessa CastagnavizCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Alejandra Gonzalez-MartinezCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Thomas PariggerCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Stephan DrothlerCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Richard GreilCancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Roland GeisbergerCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Theo F J KrausPathologic Institute of the University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Alexander RomagnaDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Christoph SchwartzDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Barbara LadisichDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Karl SotlarPathologic Institute of the University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Cornelia Hauser-KronbergerPathologic Institute of the University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Beate Alinger-ScharingerPathologic Institute of the University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
Markus SteinerCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Nadja ZaborskyCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria.
Simon Peter GampenriederCancer Research Laboratory of the Department of Internal Medicine III, University Hospital Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Müllner Hauptstraße 48, Salzburg, 5020, Austria. s.gampenrieder@salk.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3966-1071

Funding

Province of Salzburg F2401018-BAS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tumor heterogeneity in breast cancer is well recognized, but research has largely focused on primary tumors, while metastatic lesions, particularly brain metastases (BM), remain understudied. With the rising incidence of BM in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and their poor prognosis, a deeper understanding of the molecular mechanisms driving BM formation, progression, and immune evasion is crucial for developing better therapeutic strategies. We performed an integrated analysis of BM and matched primary breast tumors using immunohistochemistry, in-situ hybridization, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) quantification, and bulk RNA sequencing. Tumor receptor status, gene expression profiles, immune cell composition, and pathway alterations were analyzed in ten patients with paired samples. Changes in receptor status were observed between primary tumors and BM, including alterations in estrogen receptor and HER2 expression. RNA sequencing revealed differentially expressed genes and pathways, with an apparent downregulation of immune-related genes in BM. Immune profiling suggested a shift in the tumor microenvironment, with BM showing lower B- and CD8 + T-cell infiltration and a relative increase in M2 macrophages and follicular helper T-cells. While these findings are descriptive and limited by sample size, they point towards a potentially more immunosuppressive milieu in BM that may contribute to immune evasion and reduced responsiveness to checkpoint inhibitor therapy. Our study highlights molecular and immunological differences between primary breast tumors and BM. The altered immune landscape in BM, characterized by diminished TIL infiltration and an increase in immunosuppressive cells, warrants further investigation in larger, more homogeneous cohorts.

Indexed as

Brain NeoplasmsBreast NeoplasmsGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGene Expression ProfilingHumansLymphocytes, Tumor-InfiltratingMacrophagesMiddle AgedTumor MicroenvironmentErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesBrain metastasis immunoprofilingBreast cancer heterogeneityImmune escapeImmunotherapyTumor microenvironment

Identifiers

PMID41905976
PMCPMC13039882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.