Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41905869›Full record

ReviewTrends in cell biology2026

Tetraploids or polyploid giants: who is truly dangerous?

Mathew Bloomfield, Shivam Vora, Dinethra Epa, Brian Gabrielli, Daniela Cimini

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Trends in cell biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mathew BloomfieldFralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA.
Shivam VoraMater Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia; Children's Medical Research Institute, Westmead, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Dinethra EpaThe University of Queensland Medical School, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Brian GabrielliMater Research Institute, Faculty of Health, Medicine and Behavioural Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia. Electronic address: brianG@uq.edu.au.
Daniela CiminiFralin Life Sciences Institute, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, VA, USA. Electronic address: cimini@vt.edu.

Funding

Combining modeling and experiments to study the evolution of cells with altered ploidyR01GM140042 · NIGMS · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI CIMINI, DANIELA, SCHMELZ, EVA M. · 2021 to 2024
$1.4M
Understanding how variations in nuclear size after whole genome doubling affect tumorigenesisF31CA271763 · NCI · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI BLOOMFIELD, MATHEW · 2023 to 2024
$85k
NCI NIH HHS F31 CA271763NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM140042
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Tetraploidy, resulting from a single whole-genome duplication (WGD) event, contributes to tumorigenesis by promoting genomic instability and functional diversity. In general, WGD beyond tetraploidy limits proliferative and tumorigenic potential, but an increasing number of studies suggest that polyploid giant cancer cells (PGCCs)-large, highly polyploid (≥8N) cells formed in response to chemotherapy-produce daughter cells with reduced DNA content that drive cancer progression. In this opinion article, we examine the literature on tetraploid cells and PGCCs from a cell biology perspective. It is our opinion that the role of tetraploidy in cancer is supported by findings from cell lines, animal models, and tumor sequencing data, while definitive evidence that viable progeny from PGCCs can promote cancer progression in human tumors is lacking.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsPolyploidyTetraploidyAnimalsHumanscancer progressionPGCCpolyploid giant cancer celltetraploidWGDwhole-genome doubling

Identifiers

PMID41905869
PMCPMC13052344

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.