ArticleAnesthesia progress2025
Challenges in Developing an Effective Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Guide.
Article in Anesthesia progress, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) is a useful technique in dentistry, but it sometimes fails due to operator and anatomical factors, leading to complications. We aimed to create an IANB guide to enhance the safety and reliability of the IANB. Methods: Three types of IANB guides were designed for a skull model using the dentition as a fixed point and the lingula as a target point. The dentition and mandible were digitized using an intraoral scanner and computed tomography, respectively. The guides were created using a 3-dimensional printer. We assessed the accuracy, production time, material usage, and cost of the 3 guides and explored the potential clinical applications. Results: The average error between the needle tip positions of the completed guide and the design was 0.63 mm. The average printing time was 201 minutes. The average amounts of biocompatible resin and support material used were 36 g and 52.3 g, respectively, with an average material cost of $21.60. Conclusion: Although the IANB guide required more time and resources than conventional IANB techniques, it exhibited suitable precision and holds promise for enhancing IANB safety and efficacy. However, its accuracy must be improved for clinical application.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.