Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904991›Full record

ArticleJAMA cardiology2026

Pregnancy-Associated Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection: A Report of the iSCAD Registry.

Agnes Koczo, Anna Grodzinsky, Esther S H Kim, Sahar Naderi, Gerald Chi, Daniella Kadian-Dodov, Heather L Gornik, Bryan Wells, Angela Taylor, Lori Tam and 12 more

Abstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA cardiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Agnes KoczoUniversity of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Anna GrodzinskySaint Luke's Mid America Heart Institute/University of Missouri-Kansas City, Kansas City.
Esther S H KimWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health, Sanger Heart & Vascular Institute, Charlotte, North Carolina.
Sahar NaderiKaiser Permanente Northern California, San Francisco, California.
Gerald ChiPERFUSE Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Daniella Kadian-DodovZena and Michael A. Wiener Cardiovascular Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York.
Heather L GornikUniversity Hospitals Harrington Heart & Vascular Institute, Cleveland, Ohio.
Bryan WellsEmory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.
Angela TaylorUniversity of Virginia Medical Center, Charlottesville.
Lori TamProvidence Heart Institute, Portland, Oregon.
Connie HessUniversity of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Jennifer LeweyUniversity of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia.
Stanislav HenkinDartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
James OrfordIntermountain Heart Institute, Intermountain Medical Center, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Gretchen WellsGill Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Kentucky School of Medicine, Lexington.
Rina MauricioUniversity of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas.
Kathryn J LindleyVanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee.
C Michael GibsonPERFUSE Study Group, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Katherine K LeonSCAD Alliance, Alexandria, Virginia.
Malissa J WoodSCAD Alliance, Alexandria, Virginia.
Jennifer A SumnerUniversity of California, Los Angeles.
Nandita S ScottMass General Brigham Heart Vascular Institute, Women's Heart Health Program, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is an increasingly recognized cause of myocardial infarction predominantly affecting women. There is a paucity of reproductive health data surrounding pregnancy-associated SCAD (P-SCAD). Objective: To examine detailed reproductive variables as well as demographics, psychosocial, and SCAD-event factors among women with a history of at least 1 prior pregnancy in a large, multicenter registry (iSCAD Registry). Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study compared data of women with P-SCAD vs women with non-pregnancy-associated SCAD (NP-SCAD) between the years 2019 and 2024 and rates of certain reproductive health features among the general reproductive-aged population in US states. Differences were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables. Exposures: Pregnancy and SCAD. Main Outcomes and Measures: Patient survey-based clinical and reproductive history variables were collected and corroborated with investigator-extracted clinical and imaging data, including detailed characterization of the SCAD event. Results: Among 907 women (median [IQR] age at enrollment, 52.0 [45.1-59.4] years; median [IQR] age at first SCAD event, 49.2 [42.3-57.1] years) with SCAD and 1 or more pregnancies, 98 had P-SCAD with median (IQR) age of 36.7 (33.7-39.1) years at time of SCAD event. Those with P-SCAD had a lower prevalence of fibromuscular dysplasia (27 of 86 [31%] vs 309 of 681 [45%]; P = .01) but similar rates of extracoronary abnormalities. Greater use of assisted reproductive technology (ART; 25 of 97 [26%] vs 98 of 804 [12%]), greater multigravida with more than 5 gestations (13 of 98 [13%] vs 55 of 809 [7%]), and preeclampsia (24 of 98 [25%] vs 101 of 809 [13%]; P = .001) were reported among women with P-SCAD. Those with P-SCAD had a more severe SCAD phenotype including higher incidence of STEMI (16 of 86 [18.6%] vs 40 of 733 [5.5%]; P < .001), multivessel segment involvement (22 of 70 [31%] vs 101 of 588 [17%]; P = .004), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) lower than 40% (4 of 15 [27%] vs 6 of 105 [7%]; P = .006). They also experienced less LVEF recovery by 1-year follow-up. The majority (661 of 887 [75%]) of both groups were primarily medically managed. Conclusions and Relevance: From this large, multisite registry, results reveal that women with P-SCAD had greater median ages at gestation, greater history of ART use, and greater instances of multigravida and preeclampsia than women with NP-SCAD and the general reproductive-aged US population. With high percentages of vascular imaging among participants, women with P-SCAD had less fibromuscular dysplasia but similar rates of extracoronary abnormalities including dissection and aneurysms as women with NP-SCAD. In this contemporary cohort, women with P-SCAD continue to represent a higher-risk phenotype with predominantly conservative management; however, they had less LVEF recovery.

Indexed as

Coronary Vessel AnomaliesPregnancy Complications, CardiovascularVascular DiseasesCohort StudiesDissection, Blood VesselFemaleHumansMiddle AgedPregnancyRegistriesRisk FactorsUnited States

Identifiers

PMID41904991
PMCPMC13034164

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.