Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904977›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of international medical research2026

Predicting time-to-event outcomes in critically ill patients with intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.

Jianhua Chen, Mengjie Wang, Xiaoqin Xia, Yuanyuan Xu, Yangang Zhu, Yu Zheng

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of international medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jianhua ChenNanjing Luhe People's Hospital, Yangzhou University, China.
Mengjie WangLianshui People's Hospital of Kangda College Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, China.
Xiaoqin XiaOperating Room, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Affiliated Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, China.
Yuanyuan XuOperating Room, Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital, Affiliated Nanjing Jiangbei Hospital of Xinglin College, Nantong University, China.
Yangang ZhuLianshui People's Hospital of Kangda College Affiliated to Nanjing Medical University, China.
Yu ZhengHuai'an TCM Hospital Affiliated to Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine, China.ORCID 0009-0009-7099-4817

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BackgroundIntracerebral hemorrhage is associated with high mortality in intensive care settings. Current prognostic models have limitations, including poor interpretability and insufficient validation in critically ill populations. In this study, we developed an interpretable machine learning model to predict survival in intensive care unit patients with intracerebral hemorrhage.MethodsThis retrospective study used data from patients with intracerebral hemorrhage in the eICU Collaborative Research Database for model development and the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database for external validation. Clinical, laboratory, and physiological parameters within 24 h of intensive care unit admission were extracted. Six machine learning survival algorithms, including the Random Survival Forest, were implemented. Model performance was assessed using the time-dependent area under the curve, concordance index, and Brier score. Model interpretability was achieved through the SHapley Additive exPlanations framework.ResultsThe cohort comprised 5797 patients from eICU and 1423 patients from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV. Random Survival Forest demonstrated superior performance, with a time-dependent area under the curve of 0.88 in internal validation and 0.82 on day 1 of external validation. SHapley Additive exPlanations analysis identified Glasgow Coma Scale score, Acute Physiology Score, age, creatinine, temperature, and systolic blood pressure as key predictors. Critical risk thresholds were Glasgow Coma Scale score <9.8, Acute Physiology Score >52.7, and age >62.9 years.ConclusionWe developed a machine learning survival prediction model that demonstrated robust performance and clinical utility. The web-based tool may enhance intensive care unit risk stratification and clinical decision-making.

Indexed as

Cerebral HemorrhageCritical IllnessMachine LearningAgedFemaleGlasgow Coma ScaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsPrognosisRandom ForestRetrospective Studiesintensive care unit mortalityIntracerebral hemorrhagemachine learningRandom Survival ForestSHapley Additive exPlanationssurvival analysis

Identifiers

PMID41904977
PMCPMC13033841

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.