ArticleJournal of epidemiology and global health2026
Surgically Treated Non-Unions and Fractures of the Femur and Tibia in Adults: A Nationwide Analysis of 888,442 Cases from the German InEK Database.
Article in Journal of epidemiology and global health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundNon-unions (NU) after fractures, especially in cases with the need of surgical intervention, represent one of the most severe complications in traumatology. As previous studies estimate post-fracture NU risk between 2% and 10% data inconsistencies persist. In particular, the data on the influence of different anatomical regions, age and sex on fracture associated NU is scarce. Therefore, this study aims to provide a comprehensive descriptively assessment of the ratio of surgically treated tibia and femur NU to tibia and femur fractures based on a nationwide dataset, with a specific focus on differences across anatomical regions.
methodsThis retrospective, population-based, cross-sectional analysis of the German InEK database (2019-2023) was conducted, including 888,442 fractures and 3,017 NU cases. The study focused on ICD- (International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems-) coded diagnoses of femur and tibia NU and their associated fractures. To enhance precision, fracture and NU sites were grouped according to different anatomical regions assessed by documented OPS- (Operation and Procedure Classification System) codes. Subgroup analyses were performed for age and sex.
resultsSurgically treated femoral shaft NU had the highest incidence (0.18 cases per 100,000 residents and year), followed closely by tibial shaft NU (0.16). The highest NU/100-fractures ratio was observed in tibial shaft (1.277), followed by distal tibia (1.095) and distal femur (0.996). Across all localisations, men had clearly higher NU/100-fractures ratios than women. NU/100-fractures ratios also varied with age, with highest ratio in the economically active population, followed by a generally decline in older patients.
conclusionThis nationwide database study indicates that surgically treated NU/fracture ratios of femur and tibia are generally low. The proportion of NU to fracture differ between different anatomical regions. In general, proximal localisations showed lower NU/100-fractures ratios than distal localisations within the femur and in comparison of femur and tibia. Independently of the anatomical localisation men had a higher NU/100-fractures ratio than women. As highest NU/100-fractures ratios were detected in the economically active population, this highlights the substantial socioeconomic burden associated with this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.