ArticleHealth & justice2026
There's (no) accounting for taste: identifying and predicting subgroups of incarcerated persons based on perceived food sufficiency and personal and lifestyle characteristics.
Article in Health & justice, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn recent decades, research focus on prison climate and normalization has increased, highlighting food as a particularly important dimension of prison life. This has recently led to policy reforms in Western Europe, aimed at improving dietary quality, meeting incarcerated persons’ food needs, and supporting sustainability goals. Meeting food needs can benefit health, well-being, and the overall prison experience, however, little is known about how food sufficiency may vary across the prison population. This study aims to identify subgroups of incarcerated persons based on their perceived food sufficiency and examines how personal and lifestyle characteristics predict membership of these subgroups.
resultsSurvey data from 3,010 incarcerated persons revealed three distinct subgroups, characterized by their overall level of perceived food sufficiency: Far too little (18%), Too little (44%), and Enough (38%). Several characteristics were associated with subgroup membership, including gender, age, physical activity level, health orientation, and the opportunity to self-cater. The opportunity to self-cater appeared as the strongest predictor; individuals without this opportunity were more likely to belong to the Far too little (OR = 2.2) and Too little (OR = 1.7) subgroups compared to the Enough subgroup.
conclusionsFood was regarded as insufficient by a considerable proportion of participants, particularly by those without the opportunity to self-cater. These findings suggest that the standard meal system may not accommodate the diverse needs within the prison population. Meeting these needs can offer multiple benefits, including supporting autonomy, agency and identity, promoting physical and mental well-being and social interactions, and reducing antisocial attitudes, thereby contributing to effective prison management and humane treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.