ReviewPrevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research2026
Multi-level Risk and Protective Factors for Vaping Onset and Escalation Among Youth: a Focus on LGBTQ + Disparities.
Review in Prevention science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Youth vaping remains a major public health concern, with sexual and gender minority youth experiencing disproportionately higher rates of e-cigarette use compared to their non-LGBTQ + peers. These disparities are not attributable to identity itself, but to social and structural conditions that shape exposure to risk and access to protection. This narrative review synthesizes evidence on shared and LGBTQ + -specific risk and protective factors for vaping initiation and escalation among youth aged 10-24 years. Guided by the Social Ecological Model, findings are organized across individual, interpersonal, organizational/community, and societal levels, and interpreted through two complementary mechanisms: a minority stress-related coping pathway and a socialization and identity pathway. Across levels, discrimination and stigma emerge as cross-cutting risk processes that intensify psychological distress, normalize vaping within social networks, and undermine protective environments. Protective factors, including identity affirmation, supportive relationships, affirming institutions, and inclusive policies, buffer these pathways and promote resilience. This review highlights limitations of one-size-fits-all prevention approaches and underscores the need for selective, mechanism-informed interventions that address both shared developmental risks and the structural drivers of LGBTQ + vaping disparities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.