ReviewPituitary2026
Sex differences in clinical and metabolic outcomes of glucocorticoid replacement therapy in adrenal insufficiency.
Review in Pituitary, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Adrenal insufficiency (AI) requires lifelong glucocorticoid replacement therapy, yet patients continue to experience excess morbidity, impaired quality of life, and increased mortality. AI exhibits marked sex differences in epidemiology, particularly in primary adrenal insufficiency, where autoimmune disease predominates in women. Whether sex differences extend to clinical outcomes and responses to glucocorticoid replacement remains incompletely understood. In this review, we synthesize available evidence on sex differences in epidemiology, cardiometabolic health, bone outcomes, quality of life, cognition, and mortality across primary, secondary, and glucocorticoid-induced AI. Emerging data suggest greater impairment in quality of life, lipid metabolism, cardiovascular risk, and subjective cognition in women, while men may be more vulnerable to skeletal complications. However, most studies were not designed to evaluate sex-specific outcomes, limiting definitive conclusions. We further review biological mechanisms that may underlie sex-specific vulnerability, including differences in cortisol transport, tissue-specific metabolism, glucocorticoid receptor signaling, adipose tissue distribution, sex hormone interactions, and highlight priorities for future sex-informed research in AI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41904747What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.