Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41904700›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2026

Pushing the limits of spatial resolution in clinical PCD-CT using a dedicated high-resolution convolutional neural network (HR-CNN).

Zhongxing Zhou, Alex K Bratt, Chi Wan Koo, Kelly K Horst, Cynthia H McCollough, Lifeng Yu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Zhongxing ZhouDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Alex K BrattDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Chi Wan KooDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Kelly K HorstDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Cynthia H McColloughDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Lifeng YuDepartment of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.

Funding

Trade-offs in human observer performance, image quality metrics, and patient doseR01EB017095 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Hao Gong, Cynthia H McCollough · 2012 to 2026
$7.0M
A Dynamic Patient Data Library and Virtual Imaging Trial Platform for Training and Evaluating AI-based Algorithms in CT ImagingR01EB036541 · NIBIB · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Lifeng Yu · 2025 to 2026
$1.3M
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB017095NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB036541NIH HHS R01EB017095NIH HHS R01 EB036541
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPhoton-counting-detector (PCD) CT systems offer ultra-high spatial resolution, yet the visual spatial resolution on clinical images often constrained by large pixel size, yielding resolutions below system capabilities. While reducing pixel size and using sharp kernels enhance visual spatial resolution, it increases noise, compromising image quality. PURPOSE: To investigate the combined effects of pixel size and reconstruction kernels on visual spatial resolution using phantom and clinical images and to develop a dedicated high-resolution deep convolutional neural network (HR-CNN) to better utilize the intrinsic high spatial resolution of PCD-CT in clinical imaging.

methodsThe relationship between spatial resolution, reconstruction kernel, and pixel size was investigated to identify strategies for utilizing the full spatial resolution potential of PCD-CT. To overcome the increased noise associated with high-resolution settings, a dedicated HR-CNN was developed to push the limit of spatial resolution in routine PCD-CT exams. The HR-CNN was trained using patient exams acquired with ultra-high-resolution (UHR) mode and reconstructed with a 150-mm field of view (FOV), matrix size of 1024×1024 (0.15-mm pixel size) and sharpest quantitative kernel (Qr89). The impact of FOV, kernel, and denoising on spatial resolution was studied using bar-pattern phantoms and a pilot clinical evaluation including 5 patients with interstitial lung diseases. Two thoracic radiologists evaluated 4 different FOV/reconstruction conditions: (1) FOV-410/Qr56-Iterative reconstruction (IR), (2) FOV-410/Qr89-IR, (3) FOV-150/Qr89-IR, and (4) FOV-150/Qr89-HR-CNN in terms of overall image quality, noise, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference.

resultsWith a FOV of 410 mm, the Qr89 sharp kernel displayed bar-patterns up to 14 lp/cm, not much higher than the routine lung kernel Qr56. When the FOV was reduced to 150 mm, Qr89-IR allowed for the visualization of line pair patterns ranging from 18 to 20 lp/cm, with 20 lp/cm being moderately discernible. The application of Qr89-HR-CNN yielded further improvement, enabling the display of line pair patterns as high as 20-22 lp/cm. In patient cases, both radiologists consistently ranked the FOV-150 images processed with HR-CNN as superior across metrics including overall image quality, noise reduction, visual spatial resolution, and overall preference. The HR-CNN reduced the noise in patients' images by 93.0 ± 0.6% and 44.9 ± 5.3% in comparison with the original FBP and IR images, respectively.

conclusionsThe spatial resolution of PCD-CT is not maximized in routine practice due to the large FOV and high noise levels at sharp kernels. The proposed HR-CNN denoising method, along with small pixel size, may allow the high spatial resolution toward the system limit to be implemented in practice, which is beneficial in the diagnosis of many diseases, including interstitial lung disease.

Indexed as

Convolutional Neural NetworksImage Processing, Computer-AssistedPhotonsSignal-To-Noise RatioTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansPhantoms, Imagingdeep learninghigh‐resolution deep convolutional neural network (HR‐CNN)noise reductionphoton‐counting detector CT

Identifiers

PMID41904700
PMCPMC13037682

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.