ReviewAlzheimer's research & therapy2026
Amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA) in Alzheimer's disease: from pathophysiology to individualized risk assessment.
Review in Alzheimer's research & therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Prospective evaluation of systemic coagulation function during anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy in Alzheimer's disease.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2026Article
- Dynamic imaging markers of incident microhemorrhages and superficial siderosis in the A4 study: A longitudinal person-interval analysis.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Comparison of safety of lecanemab and donanemab: a real-world disproportionality analysis using the FDA adverse event reporting system.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies targeting amyloid-β are the first approved disease-modifying treatment for Alzheimer’s disease. While amyloid-targeting therapies mitigate the progression of cognitive decline in early-stage Alzheimer’s disease, they are associated with amyloid-related imaging abnormalities (ARIA), an imaging phenomenon presenting as cerebral edema/effusion and/or hemorrhage. Redistribution of parenchymal amyloid-β to perivascular drainage pathways and direct antibody-amyloid interactions within the cerebral vasculature are considered key players in ARIA pathophysiology by promoting inflammation and vascular disruption, thus mirroring hallmarks of inflammatory cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Although ARIA is commonly regarded as an undesired side effect of amyloid-targeting therapies, its association with amyloid-β clearance from the brain opens up the possibility of an alternative interpretation as a physiological reaction to target engagement of anti-amyloid antibodies.Understanding risk factors that promote the occurrence of ARIA and its transformation from asymptomatic imaging phenomenon to its serious and severe form are of great importance to clinical practice. ARIA risk and severity are influenced by apolipoprotein E4 status, microvascular damage, and cerebral amyloid angiopathy, but may be further modulated by antibody binding preferences and comorbidities such as arterial hypertension and ischemic strokes. Identifying individual risk profiles based on deeper insights into pathophysiological pathways may improve patient safety and lead to personalized treatment concepts in Alzheimer’s disease.In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of ARIA pathophysiology, highlight important risk factors and discuss their relevance in clinical risk management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.