ArticleJournal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences2026
Utility of the mini-mental state examination for assessing cognitive function in determining appropriate medication management strategies in patients with heart failure: a retrospective observational study.
Article in Journal of pharmaceutical health care and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients with heart failure frequently experience recurrent hospitalizations, with poor medication adherence serving as a primary determinant of adverse clinical outcomes. Given the elevated prevalence of cognitive impairment among elderly patients with heart failure, the implementation of individualized medication management strategies is imperative. This study aimed to elucidate the association between Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores and the feasibility of various medication management strategies in hospitalized patients with heart failure.
methodsThis retrospective observational study analyzed 148 patients with heart failure aged ≥ 65 years. Subjects were categorized into three groups based on their medication management at discharge: self-management via medication envelopes (press-through-package sheets or unit-dose packaging), self-management using a medication calendar, or nurse-assisted administration. Multivariate logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were performed to identify predictors of self-management feasibility.
resultsThe MMSE score was the sole parameter showing significant differences across all pairwise comparisons between management groups. Multivariate analysis identified the MMSE score as an independent predictor for both self-management via envelopes and the necessity of adherence aids. For self-management utilizing medication envelopes, ROC analysis yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.848, with an optimal cutoff threshold of ≥ 27 (sensitivity: 78.6%; specificity: 80.2%). For the broader feasibility of self-administration (using either envelopes or calendar), the AUC was 0.820, with a threshold of ≥ 24 (sensitivity: 83.7%; specificity: 67.9%). Additionally, patients of heart failure-related readmission associated with poor adherence occurred exclusively when established management protocols were discontinued post-discharge.
conclusionsMMSE scores may represent a valuable tool for predicting the successful establishment of medication management strategies. Specifically, scores below 27 suggest a need for adherence aids like medication calendar, while scores below 24 indicate a substantial requirement for external caregiver or nursing assistance to ensure therapeutic adherence.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.